Users Online : 257 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
  Search
 
  
     Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Lian T
    -  Liu G
    -  Zhang Y
    Article in PDF
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Presentation
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed97    
    PDF Downloaded0    

Recommend this journal

 

Previous Article  Table of Contents   Next Article  
UNUSUAL CASE
Year :   |  Volume :   |  Issue :   |  Page :
 

Double common bile duct with cholelithiasis


1 The 2nd Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China
2 The 1st Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou, China

Date of Submission26-Feb-2022
Date of Decision03-Apr-2022
Date of Acceptance27-Apr-2022
Date of Web Publication11-Jul-2022

Correspondence Address:
Tianming Lian,
The 2nd Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_85_22

PMID: 35915529

  Abstract 

Double common bile duct is a rare congenital anomaly among biliary anomalies. The anomaly has an important clinical implication because of its association with biliary tract obstruction. In addition, if one of the two common bile ducts is mistaken for the cystic duct during surgery, residual stones and bile duct injury are likely to occur. Here, we report a case of double choledochal variation (Type Vb) with choledochal calculi. An 82-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital due to mild pain in the upper abdomen accompanied by vomiting for 3 days. Magnetic resonance imaging suggested common bile duct lithiasis, variation of the common bile duct and moderate biliary tract dilation. Laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy was performed for choledocholithotomy. During the operation, left and right choledocholithotomy was performed, and all the gallstones were removed via choledochoscope. The patient's post-operative recovery was good, and no recurrence of cholelith had been observed at the time of writing.


Keywords: Choledochoscope, cholelithiasis, double common bile duct, laparoscopic, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography



How to cite this URL:
Lian T, Liu G, Zhang Y. Double common bile duct with cholelithiasis. J Min Access Surg [Epub ahead of print] [cited 2022 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.journalofmas.com/preprintarticle.asp?id=350696



  Introduction Top


Double common bile duct (DCBD) is an extremely rare condition among anatomical variations in the biliary tract system. To date, no more than 100 cases of DCBD variation have been reported.[1] Here, we report a case of successful treatment of double choledochal variation (Type Vb) with choledochal lithiasis via laparoscopy combined with choledochoscope. This case highlights the importance of recognition of this condition to avoid missed diagnosis and bile duct injury during surgery, coupled with the need for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) examination before surgery.


  Case Presentation Top


The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Meizhou People's Hospital (2021-C-50), and informed consent has been signed. An 82-year-old woman was admitted for repeated epigastrium mild pain for 6 years aggravated with vomiting for 3 days. She had undergone hysterectomy due to ectopic pregnancy at the age of 32 years and subtotal gastrectomy (Billroth II) due to gastric perforation at the age of 40 years. Due to calculus of gallbladder with acute cholecystitis, cholecystectomy was performed at the age of 52 years. After admission, physical examination revealed only two surgical scars measuring about 15 cm and 8 cm at the middle and lower abdomen, respectively, and epigastric tenderness without rebound pain. Laboratory test results indicated alanine aminotransferase of 321 U/L, AST of 118 U/L and Dbil of 10.2 μmol/L. MRCP indicated sediment samples at the bottom of the choledochal duct and thickening of the tube wall at the end of the choledochal duct. The common bile duct in the upper of the pancreas was bisected by a membrane, and communicated in the common hepatic duct. The findings were thought to be congenital variations [Figure 1]. The patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on day 6 after admission. During surgery, a variety of methods were used to try to insert a Zebra guidewire into the bile duct. Unfortunately, none of the methods were successful. The patient was in too much pain to tolerate surgery, so we stopped operating. We performed choledochal incision and stone extraction by laparoscopy combined choledochoscope. Intra-operative exploration revealed that the common bile duct was separated by a septum, in which the left and right hepatic ducts communicated in the upper common bile duct each other. Then, the left and right choledochs merged at the bottom of bile duct. During the operation, the left and right bile ducts were incised separately. The bile duct was rinsed, the gallstones were removed, the right side choledoch was stitched for a continuous period and the left bile duct was retained with a 20 Fr T-tube for drainage [Figure 2]. On day 2 after surgery, the patient was given a liquid diet and got out of bed for exercise by herself. The patient was discharged on the post-operative day 10 with a T-tube. Two months later, the T-tube was removed without any complications.
Figure 1: MRCP showing a septum between the right and left choledoch, as well as the pancreatic duct and duodenum. MRCP: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Operative findings: DCBD variation was observed in which the left and right hepatic ducts and lower bile duct communicated with each other, which got into the duodenum. (b and c) The left and right bile ducts were cut separately. (d) The right side choledoch was stitched for a continuous period and the left bile duct was retained with a 20 Fr T-tube for drainage. DCBD: Double common bile duct

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The earliest classification of DCBD was developed by Goor and Ebert based on anatomical structure.[2] The classification currently used is based on morphology proposed by Choi in 2007, who described additional variants.[3] This case presents an extremely rare congenital anomaly of the biliary system in an adult patient. To our knowledge, this is the first case to report a double choledochal variation with calculi treated by laparoscopy and choledochoscope in the Asian population, and only the third case reported to be Vb in the world.[4] MRCP is a non-invasive examination and has obvious advantages in bile duct imaging compared with other examinations, especially in cases of bile duct variation.[5]

Although DCBD variation was detected by MRCP in the present case, the patient had a history of multiple abdominal surgeries and various other diseases, which made diagnosis and treatment a great challenge. In order to remove the choledochal calculi and relieve the biliary obstruction, laparoscopy combined choledochoscope was selected as the surgical programme. The results showed that the common bile duct was bisected by a septum from the opening of the cystic duct to the bottom of the common bile duct, which was a DCBD variation of Type Vb.

In summary, this article reports a rare case of DCBD of type Vb. This case reminds us of the need for MRCP in the management of bile duct surgery, as well as the need for timely discovery and understanding of the corresponding biliary variation to formulate a reasonable surgical programme. Surgeons should be familiar with this kind of variation. We hope this case provides useful information in dealing with choledochal variation with cholelithiasis, thereby reducing misdiagnosis and biliary injury in the future.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Fan X, He L, Khadaroo PA, Zhou D, Lin H. Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct: A case report and review of the literatures. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9953.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Goor DA, Ebert PA. Anomalies of the biliary tree. Report of a repair of an accessory bile duct and review of the literature. Arch Surg 1972;104:302-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Choi E, Byun JH, Park BJ, Lee MG. Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct with anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system revealed by MR cholangiopancreatography. Br J Radiol 2007;80:e150-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Chin JL, Sengupta S, Morrin MM, Murray FE, Patchett SE. Common bile duct duplication: Double bile ducts, double trouble. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:855-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Park M, Kim B, Kim T, Kim M, Kim K. Double common bile duct: Curved-planar reformatted computed tomography (CT) and gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR cholangiography. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:209-11.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous Article  Next Article

    

2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04