| ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 207-211
Conventional versus single-incision laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of ovarian torsion
Murat Gozukucuk1, Yetkin Karasu2, Sena Münire Kaya1, Erhan Yangır1, Yusuf Üstün1
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VM Medical Park Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopy with conventional laparoscopy in cases of ovarian torsion.
Materials and Methods: Patients who were surgically treated for ovarian torsion in our clinic were retrospectively analysed. The demographic information and surgical records of the patients were obtained from the patient files. Patients treated with single-incision laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, surgical procedure performed, duration of surgery, amount of bleeding, laboratory results, post-operative pain scores and length of hospital stay.
Results: There were 19 patients in the single-incision laparoscopy and 30 in the conventional laparoscopy groups. The two groups were similar in terms of age, obstetric history and body mass index (P > 0.05). The mean operation time was 56.26 ± 15.34 min in the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) group and 55.07 ± 10.78 min in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of complications, duration of hospital stay, pre- and post-operative haematocrit difference and visual analogue scale-pain scores at hours 0, 6, 12 and 24 (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: SILS appears to be as feasible, effective and safe as conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of ovarian torsion cases.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ulucanlar Street No: 89, Altındağ, Ankara
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*