Users Online : 1192 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Article in PDF (407 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded162    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents     
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 139-140

Lost umbilical tape in laparoscopic surgery: Consequences and lessons learned

Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India

Date of Submission12-Dec-2019
Date of Decision20-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance27-Jan-2020
Date of Web Publication24-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Saket Kumar
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_284_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kumar S, Kurian N, Singh RK. Lost umbilical tape in laparoscopic surgery: Consequences and lessons learned. J Min Access Surg 2021;17:139-40

How to cite this URL:
Kumar S, Kurian N, Singh RK. Lost umbilical tape in laparoscopic surgery: Consequences and lessons learned. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 17];17:139-40. Available from:

Dear Sir,

Lost foreign body during minimally invasive surgery may lead to serious problems. Retrieval of the lost object leads to prolongation of surgical time, and in rare instances, exploratory laparotomy may also be required.

Recently, we encountered an interesting case in which a missing umbilical tape could not be traced and required conversion to open. The tape was finally retrieved from a very unusual location after reviewing the surgical recording. This incident emphasises the significance of maintaining surgical counts, using radiopaque markers and also recording the operative procedures.

A 14-year-old girl with a 6-month history of pain in the upper abdomen was diagnosed with a choledochal cyst. She underwent laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision in the elective setting. At the end of the procedure, the scrub nurse reported discrepancy in the surgical item count. An umbilical tape, which was used for looping the choledochal cyst, was noted missing. The laparoscope was reintroduced in the abdomen and a thorough search for the missing umbilical tape was made. Anatomical recesses, interbowel loop and other probable sites were looked for. Despite a thorough and meticulous search, the missing tape could not be located laparoscopically. As the umbilical tape was without a radiopaque marker, fluoroscopic localisation was not possible. At last, the procedure had to be converted to open and the search was continued. Meanwhile, the counts were repeated several times and frantic search for the missing tape was done outside. After a futile 90 min exercise, the search was called off and the abdomen was closed. The surgical team later decided to review the operative video as a last resort to locate the umbilical tape.

The surgical video was replayed and was minutely scrutinised. On review, it was realised that the umbilical tape was not readily removed after use and was left purposeless in the surgical field. As the patient had mild oozing during the procedure, intermittent suctioning was done to clean the operative field. In one of the video frames, the umbilical tape was seen getting aspirated into the suction tube. The suction jar was then emptied and the tape was found lying at the bottom of it. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged on postoperative day 6.

Surgical counting at the end of the procedure is essential to prevent unintended retained surgical items (RSIs). The reported incidence of RSI varies between 0.3 and 1.0/1000 abdominal operations.[1] RSIs can be a cause of significant postoperative morbidity and even mortality, leading to litigations and criminal lawsuit.[2] Routine intraoperative radiography and use of radiofrequency-tagged sponges have been suggested to locate the missing or RSIs.[3]

Our case describes an unusual situation where an umbilical tape got sucked and led to conversion of minimally invasive procedure to open. This increased the operative time and prolonged the hospital stay of the patient. This experience underscores the importance of exclusively using radiopaque marked items during surgery and removing them as soon as their purpose is served.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Zejnullahu VA, Bicaj BX, Zejnullahu VA, Hamza AR. Retained surgical foreign bodies after surgery. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2017;5:97-100.  Back to cited text no. 1
Reddy A, Mahajan R, Rustagi T, Goel SA, Bansal ML, Chhabra HS. A new search algorithm for reducing the incidence of missing cottonoids in the operating theater. Asian Spine J 2019;13:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
Steelman VM. Sensitivity of detection of radiofrequency surgical sponges: A prospective, cross-over study. Am J Surg 2011;201:233-7.  Back to cited text no. 3


Print this article  Email this article


2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04