| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||3344 |
| Printed||71 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||105 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
Click on image for details.
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE
|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 315-320
Use of a novel multi-purpose sponge for laparoscopic surgery: Does it have special relevance to robotically-assisted laparoscopic surgery?
Luca Morelli1, Simone Guadagni2, Elena Troia3, Gregorio Di Franco2, Matteo Palmeri2, Giovanni Caprili2, Cristiano D'Isidoro2, Andrea Moglia4, Roberta Pisano2, Andrea Pietrabissa5, Alfred Cuschieri6, Franco Mosca4
1 EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa; General Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
2 General Surgery Unit, Department of Oncology Transplantation and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
3 BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy
4 EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
5 Division of General Surgery, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
6 BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
Background: The STAR System (Ekymed SpA) is a novel multipurpose sponge developed for conventional manual laparoscopic surgery. Materials and Methods: Between December 2012 and December 2014, we successfully used the sponge in ten robot-assisted and ten direct manual laparoscopic operations to achieve haemostasis, for blunt dissections, for atraumatic lifting of solid organs, to check for bile leaks, for cleaning the surgical field thus avoiding frequent use of suction or the application of haemostatic agents. The reason of the insertion (RI), the main use (MU) and any further use (FU), once inserted, were registered for each operation and compared between the two groups. Results: The principal RI was haemostasis for minor bleeding, without differences between the two groups (P = not significant). Regard to MU, in the robotic group cleaning the surgical field was utilised more than laparoscopic group (100% vs. 60%; P = 0.03). About FU, atraumatic solid organs lifting was more frequent during robotically assisted surgery than with laparoscopy (50% vs. 0%; P = 0.01). A statistically more frequent use of the sponge was registered during standard laparoscopy for the blunt dissection (30% vs. 80%; P = 0.03). Conclusions: The STAR System was beneficial in both approaches, but it imparts added benefit during robotically-assisted laparoscopic surgery organs because of the lack of tactile feedback and because the operating surgeon is remote from the patient, and has to rely on the assisting surgeon in the sterile field for dealing with bleeding episodes, cleansing/mopping the operative field when necessary, who may not be experienced or completely proficient.
Division of General Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, 56124 Pisa
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*