Users Online : 4852 About us |  Subscribe |  e-Alerts  | Feedback | Login   |   
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery Current Issue | Archives | Ahead Of Print Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
           Print this page Email this page   Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (908 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded127    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


 Table of Contents     
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 253-254

SMILS: Single-site, multi-Incision, laparoscopic surgery, the way forward?

Department of General Surgery, Apollo Hospital, Bangalore, India

Date of Web Publication3-Oct-2011

Correspondence Address:
Saurabh Misra
C1/901, L and T South City, Arekery Mico Layout, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore - 560 076
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.85653

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Misra S. SMILS: Single-site, multi-Incision, laparoscopic surgery, the way forward?. J Min Access Surg 2011;7:253-4

How to cite this URL:
Misra S. SMILS: Single-site, multi-Incision, laparoscopic surgery, the way forward?. J Min Access Surg [serial online] 2011 [cited 2022 Jan 19];7:253-4. Available from:

Dear Sir,

I have read with great interest, the special edition on Laparo-Endoscopic Single Incision Surgery (LESS). The single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) indeed is an advancement over the multi-port laparoscopic surgery. However, there are certain concerns about the procedure, which are valid and need to be addressed before it can be taken as a procedure of choice. Firstly, the post-operative pain is indeed more in the LESS group in the first 24 hours compared with the conventional laparoscopic surgery, which has been highlighted in a few studies. [1] We share this observation. Secondly, there is a concern regarding incisional hernias in these patients. [2],[3] Lastly, the cost burden, which the patient has to withstand when opting for this form of surgery makes it a lesser attractive choice.

To address these issues, in our institution, we have developed a rather simple form of laparoscopic surgery, which we call as SMILS or 'Single-site, Multi-incision Laparoscopic Surgery'. This concept arose from the fact that triangulation of the instruments can be achieved within the umbilicus, without getting preoccupied with the idea of 'single incision', that is, the SILS port can be achieved on the umbilicus without the port itself. The ports used in the technique were routine reusable ports (low-profile ports are useful) and the instruments were either routine laparoscopic surgery instruments or articulating ones.

In this technique, all the three ports are placed directly on the umbilicus in a strategic way using three separate incisions. The orientation of the three ports differs with the kind of surgery. As this surgery is not a single-port surgery, no flaps are raised as described in SIMPLE [4] and no special ports were used, thus avoiding the problems faced with it like the seroma formation or huge cost burden faced with SILS port. We made three ports of 5 mm each on the umbilicus [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] and surprisingly had little difficulty in operating as we were already doing LESS surgery on a regular basis. However, this technique closely resembles to that described by Piskun and Rajpal, who used only two ports on the umbilicus. [5]
Figure 1: Port confi guration for SMILS appendicectomy

Click here to view
Figure 2: The completed SMILS surgery

Click here to view

We have done more than 29 surgical procedures, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, laparoscopic tubal ligations, laparoscopic ectopic surgery, laparoscopic ovarian cyst surgery and compared our results with those of the LESS group, which we had done earlier; the result of which is due for publication. The organs are retrieved either by making one of the ports as 10 mm or connecting two adjacent ports.

The advantages, we observed, were that the post-operative pain, seemed less compared with the LESS group. Moreover, the postoperative scar was very much better than the single-incision group, and as there were no incisions larger than 5-10 mm, there were less chances of incisional hernia. Above all, the cost of the surgery was almost same as that of conventional laparoscopic surgery. A large scale study is under way to document these observations with respect to pain scores, cosmoses, and cost effectiveness, comparing the two techniques.

  References Top

1.Woldrich JM, Holmes N, Palazzi-Churas K, Alagiri M, DeCambre M, Kaplan G, et al. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site, conventional laparoscopic, and open nephrectomy in a pediatric population. Urology 2011;78:74-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
2.Rao PP, Rao PP, Bhagwat S. Single incision laparoscopic surgery: Current status and controversies. J Minim Access Surg 2011;7:6-16.  Back to cited text no. 2
3.Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C. Does the extraction-Site location in laparoscopic surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 2008;22:2596-600.  Back to cited text no. 3
4.Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Poblete H, King SA, Curcillo PG. Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: A completely transumbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:219-22.  Back to cited text no. 4
5.Piskin G, Rajpal S. Transumbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy utilizes no incision outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999;9:361-4.  Back to cited text no. 5


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 More With LESS: A Novel Report of Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Performed Using LESS
Riddhi Desai,Shailesh P. Puntambekar,Akhil Lawande,Rahul Kenawadekar,Saurabh Joshi,Geetanjali Agarwal Joshi,Santosh Kulkarni
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2013; 20(6): 886
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Print this article  Email this article


2004 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
Online since 15th August '04